The bLack of Respect Campaign

Dignity, Respect, Pride & Achievement come when people are described & treated like humans

MORE INFO

Please sign our online petition 

The bLack of Respect Campaign (BORC) is a campaign for modernisation and positive change, a campaign for respect and true equality.


The majority of population groups are referred to in terms of heritage; two are still referred to by inaccurate representations of "skin colour". In the 21st century and onwards, it makes sense for everyone to be referred to by heritage, not just some.

SIGN NOW

Feature Articles

By LN012620 10 Jun, 2021
150 lecturers at Oriel college can't all be wrong in joining the student protesters in condemning moral obstinacy
By Dr Allswell E.Eno 10 Jun, 2021
BORC overview of taking the knee in Britain and the public and media responses
By Dr Allswell E. Eno 08 Jun, 2021
They say the truth sets you free, don't they ?
By Dr Allswell E. Eno 25 May, 2021
The two-tier system that even the supposedly educated, including certain elected officials, are happy to reinforce
By Dr Allswell E. Eno 23 May, 2021
"What colour am I? Am I beige? Or is it ochre? Or off-white?"  Answer: Broaden your thought process. Evolve. Think deeper than skin and try heritage instead.
By Allswell E. Eno 02 May, 2021
The social media blackout by sportspeople and clubs this Bank Holiday weekend is all very well as far as gestures or symbolism goes. Let’s hope the social media companies get the message. I note BBC pundit and ex-Premiership and England footballer Ian Wright has spent time showing his contemporary, co-pundit and friend Alan Shearer examples of the online abuse he has received and telling him how much this hurts him and how racist terrace chanting during his professional football-playing days hurt him. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/av/football/56949360 But my questions to Ian Wright are these: What exactly is it you were expecting from Alan Shearer by telling him and showing him this? Sympathy? No. He’s not of African heritage, so he won’t have experienced these forms of abuse. Empathy? Perhaps. And Shearer was duty-bound to show that, given that the pair of you were doing this exercise in front of TV cameras. He was hardly going to defend it, or commend it, unless he’s more ignorant than you thought, or an unrepentant racist, or suffering from dementia. I suspect he’s already onside (no pun intended). But then what? What else exactly is it you’re expecting ‘Al’ to do? As is often the case when this is presented to peers of European heritage, all this exercise achieved was to make Shearer look embarrassed, wear as concerned an expression as he could, express the obligatory disgust on camera, express his angst about saying the wrong thing and ask you what you thought. Do you not think he’s already aware of racism in the world of British and European football? Do you not think he will have seen and heard racist chanting and banana throwing on the terraces at football grounds around the country in all his years playing in the premiership and for England and as he climbed up the ranks to Division 1 before that? Or heard or heard of racist punditry from the likes of Ron Atkinson in the past? He admitted as much as to what he heard inside British football stadia. How can he not have heard it? Then he admitted to not having spoken out at the time. It would have been pointless asking him why and you didn’t. The online abuse is just a new form of it. What exactly is it that you’re trying to prove to him that he doesn’t already know? How does this illustration to Alan Shearer of your pain, soul-bearing to him, advance the cause of tackling online and terrace racism? “White allies” to quote you? You’ve fed the racists, telling them how much it hurts, and giving them the fodder with the ‘b’-word. This isn’t the route to take. Perhaps you should read this: “Why I’m no longer talking to white people about race” by Reni Eddo-Lodge, not that I agree with any of the terminology she uses, and I’ll say why in a moment. Where I do agree with you is where you complain the abuse reduces you to nothing but a skin colour…and, I would add, an inaccurate one at that. This is at the heart of the problem and has always been, for this specific form of racism, and here I address the millions that remain trapped in this ancient, European-imposed ‘colour’ paradigm, or bubble, including Reni Eddo-Lodge. Until this system of misrepresented colour in reference to people of African heritage and of European heritage is de-constructed, dismantled, this particular form of racism will continue indefinitely. Taking away “black” in reference to self and referring to the self as a person of African heritage disconnects you from the “I’m the opposite of a “white” person" notion and forces the lazy racist to choose between coming up with something new to replace “black” this or “black” that with, and, better still, giving up completely. There have been footballers of European heritage making statements of solidarity with “black” footballers for years. They are not going to solve it. Crying to Alan Shearer and other footballers of European heritage on TV and radio and online isn’t the solution; the answer is in us. A change of language in self-reference will self-immunise and negate the effects of this rubbish. In other words, short-circuit the problem: remove the tools that are the racists' stock in trade. STOP TRADING IN THE CURRENCY THE RACISTS TRADE IN - the 'B'-word Allswell E. Eno
By Dr Allswell E. Eno 20 Apr, 2021
The ‘B’ word - Black What has it done for us and what has it done to us?

Our Aims

To minimise racism, inadvertent or not, when referring to people of the African diaspora.
To unify the method and terminology used to describe all populations.


To accord dignity and respect to all populations by referring to everyone by heritage rather than by racist and false notions of ‘colour of skin’.

Specifically, to stop perpetuating ‘black’ and ‘white’ to propagate the false and racist idea that people of African heritage and those of European heritage are the biological opposite of each other – an idea that was conceived during the transatlantic trafficking of Africans (the transatlantic slave trade) and which was used to underpin it and the colonialism that followed.

Our Objectives

To modernise the template the Office for National Statistics uses for ethnic categories, which is inconsistent in using ‘colour’ for some populations while using heritage for the rest. 

Remove from the ONS template the words ‘black’ and ‘white’ as the headline categories to refer to people of African and European heritages respectively and use heritage-respecting terminology as it does for the other populations, to be consistent throughout.


Replace ‘black’ with ‘of African heritage’, which truthfully recognises and respects the common continental ancestral heritage of continental African, African-Caribbean, African-American etc. people, but accords them the dignity of reference that other populations of the world have.


This term to be used in conversation and print as a generic global term to replace ‘black’ for anyone of African heritage.

The specific regional categories Continental, African-Brazilian, African-American, African-Caribbean and British of African heritage to be used when you know the person’s exact region of birth or their nationality. These to be listed below the heading ‘of African heritage’. We have coined the term ‘Afroic’ as a single-word term but less now for the people and more as an umbrella term for inanimate things such as our music, cuisines and businesses.


Replace ‘white’ with ‘European/Of European heritage’ as the single-word heading.

Our Rationale

As explained in the aims – uniformity, fairness, human dignity, respect, modernisation, closing another avenue for persistent racism.


Precedents – we have already seen language use become increasingly modern and enlightened in the last 30 years in relation to other populations out of respect for them. For example:


Terminology for people born to parents of different heritages in the UK has moved from ‘half-caste’ in the 1960s and 70s to ‘mixed race’, to ‘mixed heritage’ or ‘dual heritage’ (or triple, quadruple etc. heritage).


People from east and south-east Asian countries such as China, Japan, Korea, Thailand and the Philippines are no longer referred to by a crude reference to their complexions, namely, as the pigment yellow, which they are not.


So-called ‘red Indians’ are now referred to as ‘Native Americans’.

So why are we the exception? What ethical, moral or logical justification is there? None really.


The name of the campaign with the capital ‘L’ in ‘black’ is there to emphasise the lack of respect inherent in referring to people of African heritage as ‘black’ and routinely defining them as the opposite of Europeans and people of European heritage, and the racist history that underpins it. We are not the ‘opposite’ of Europeans or people of European heritage, any more than Asian, Arab or any other population is.


What’s more, this crude fixation on ‘skin colour’ denies our wholeness as human beings, as well as any reference to or respect for our continental ancestry and our diverse pre-colonial history, civilisations and cultures. Holocaust-denial is rightly condemned and outlawed in countries that consider themselves civilised and forward-thinking. So should heritage-denial be.


In the 21st century we believe what we put forth promotes human dignity and falls into line with the ideals espoused by the UN Convention on Human Rights.

Latest News

By LN012620 10 Jun, 2021
150 lecturers at Oriel college can't all be wrong in joining the student protesters in condemning moral obstinacy
By Dr Allswell E.Eno 10 Jun, 2021
BORC overview of taking the knee in Britain and the public and media responses
By Dr Allswell E. Eno 08 Jun, 2021
They say the truth sets you free, don't they ?
By Dr Allswell E. Eno 25 May, 2021
The two-tier system that even the supposedly educated, including certain elected officials, are happy to reinforce
By Dr Allswell E. Eno 23 May, 2021
"What colour am I? Am I beige? Or is it ochre? Or off-white?"  Answer: Broaden your thought process. Evolve. Think deeper than skin and try heritage instead.
By Allswell E. Eno 02 May, 2021
The social media blackout by sportspeople and clubs this Bank Holiday weekend is all very well as far as gestures or symbolism goes. Let’s hope the social media companies get the message. I note BBC pundit and ex-Premiership and England footballer Ian Wright has spent time showing his contemporary, co-pundit and friend Alan Shearer examples of the online abuse he has received and telling him how much this hurts him and how racist terrace chanting during his professional football-playing days hurt him. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/av/football/56949360 But my questions to Ian Wright are these: What exactly is it you were expecting from Alan Shearer by telling him and showing him this? Sympathy? No. He’s not of African heritage, so he won’t have experienced these forms of abuse. Empathy? Perhaps. And Shearer was duty-bound to show that, given that the pair of you were doing this exercise in front of TV cameras. He was hardly going to defend it, or commend it, unless he’s more ignorant than you thought, or an unrepentant racist, or suffering from dementia. I suspect he’s already onside (no pun intended). But then what? What else exactly is it you’re expecting ‘Al’ to do? As is often the case when this is presented to peers of European heritage, all this exercise achieved was to make Shearer look embarrassed, wear as concerned an expression as he could, express the obligatory disgust on camera, express his angst about saying the wrong thing and ask you what you thought. Do you not think he’s already aware of racism in the world of British and European football? Do you not think he will have seen and heard racist chanting and banana throwing on the terraces at football grounds around the country in all his years playing in the premiership and for England and as he climbed up the ranks to Division 1 before that? Or heard or heard of racist punditry from the likes of Ron Atkinson in the past? He admitted as much as to what he heard inside British football stadia. How can he not have heard it? Then he admitted to not having spoken out at the time. It would have been pointless asking him why and you didn’t. The online abuse is just a new form of it. What exactly is it that you’re trying to prove to him that he doesn’t already know? How does this illustration to Alan Shearer of your pain, soul-bearing to him, advance the cause of tackling online and terrace racism? “White allies” to quote you? You’ve fed the racists, telling them how much it hurts, and giving them the fodder with the ‘b’-word. This isn’t the route to take. Perhaps you should read this: “Why I’m no longer talking to white people about race” by Reni Eddo-Lodge, not that I agree with any of the terminology she uses, and I’ll say why in a moment. Where I do agree with you is where you complain the abuse reduces you to nothing but a skin colour…and, I would add, an inaccurate one at that. This is at the heart of the problem and has always been, for this specific form of racism, and here I address the millions that remain trapped in this ancient, European-imposed ‘colour’ paradigm, or bubble, including Reni Eddo-Lodge. Until this system of misrepresented colour in reference to people of African heritage and of European heritage is de-constructed, dismantled, this particular form of racism will continue indefinitely. Taking away “black” in reference to self and referring to the self as a person of African heritage disconnects you from the “I’m the opposite of a “white” person" notion and forces the lazy racist to choose between coming up with something new to replace “black” this or “black” that with, and, better still, giving up completely. There have been footballers of European heritage making statements of solidarity with “black” footballers for years. They are not going to solve it. Crying to Alan Shearer and other footballers of European heritage on TV and radio and online isn’t the solution; the answer is in us. A change of language in self-reference will self-immunise and negate the effects of this rubbish. In other words, short-circuit the problem: remove the tools that are the racists' stock in trade. STOP TRADING IN THE CURRENCY THE RACISTS TRADE IN - the 'B'-word Allswell E. Eno
By Dr Allswell E. Eno 20 Apr, 2021
The ‘B’ word - Black What has it done for us and what has it done to us?
Share by: